[5 Case studies] CQI
- Kriss Nakhon
- Jul 17, 2025
- 2 min read
5 automotive case studies with problem types, methodologies applied, and key results, using 5 Whys, 8D, FMEA, Six Sigma (DMAIC), and Kaizen/PDCA:
Automotive CQI Case Studies Matrix
(Problems sourced from real-world scenarios in OEMs/Tier 1 suppliers)
Case Study | Problem Description | Methodology Used | Key Steps Applied | Key Results |
1. Paint Defects in Body Shop | Frequent fisheyes (bubbles) on car doors. | 5 Whys | 1. Why? → Contaminated paint. 2. Why? → Dirty air filters. 3. Why? → No PM schedule. 4. Why? → Missing SOP. 5. Why? → Inadequate training. | Result: Implemented filter checks + training. Defects reduced by 90%. |
2. Engine Mount Failures | Customer returns due to cracked mounts. | 8D Problem-Solving | 1. D1: Formed cross-functional team. 2. D4: Root cause → Poor rubber curing. 3. D6: Corrective action → Revised curing time/temp. 4. D7: Updated PFMEA. | Result: Warranty claims dropped by 75%. |
3. ABS Sensor False Alerts | High field failures in ABS sensors. | FMEA (PFMEA) | 1. Identified failure mode: Moisture ingress. 2. RPN=432 (Severity=9, Occurrence=6, Detection=8). 3. Added sealant + ingress testing. | Result: RPN reduced to 56, field failures down 60%. |
4. Transmission Leaks | 12% leak rate in final inspection. | Six Sigma (DMAIC) | 1. Measure: Leaks at gasket joint. 2. Analyze: Torque variation (MSA proved gauge imprecise). 3. Improve: Automated torque wrench + training. 4. Control: SPC charts for torque. | Result: Leaks reduced to 0.8%, saving $500K/year. |
5. Assembly Line Bottleneck | 20% idle time at wheel station. | Kaizen/PDCA | 1. Plan: Time-motion study. 2. Do: Relocated tools + kanban racks. 3. Check: Cycle time ↓ 30%. 4. Act: Standardized across shifts. | Result: Productivity ↑ 25%, eliminated overtime costs. |
Methodology Comparison & Outcomes
Tool | Strengths | Limitations | Best for Automotive Use Cases |
5 Whys | Fast, simple, no data needed. | Superficial if stopping too early. | Quick shopfloor fixes (e.g., contamination, misalignments). |
8D | Structured, customer-focused. | Time-intensive for small issues. | Warranty claims, supplier defects (IATF 16949 must). |
FMEA | Proactive risk prevention. | Subjective scoring (SOD). | Design/process risks (e.g., sensor failures, weld cracks). |
Six Sigma (DMAIC) | Data-driven, high ROI. | Requires statistical expertise. | Chronic defects (leaks, noise/vibration). |
Kaizen/PDCA | Engages frontline teams. | Small-scale impact. | Lean waste reduction (motion, waiting, inventory). |
Regulatory & Standards Alignment
IATF 16949: Mandates 8D for customer complaints, FMEA for risk management.
Six Sigma: Often used for PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) critical characteristics.
Kaizen: Supports Lean Manufacturing (part of Toyota Production System).
Visual Workflow
Problem → Tool Selection → Results
Simple root cause? → 5 Whys.
Customer complaint? → 8D.
High-risk failure? → FMEA.
Complex data-driven issue? → DMAIC.
Process waste? → Kaizen.
_edited.jpg)
Comments